<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neblog &#187; FlashCONNECT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/category/tech/mv/flashconnect/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Nebula</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Website Design &#8211; Establish a consistent theme</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2008/03/ui-design01.html</link>
		<comments>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2008/03/ui-design01.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Gravagno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DesignBais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlashCONNECT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/tech/aspnet/2008/03/ui-design01.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For developers who use ASP.NET, DesignBais, and other tools, it&#8217;s important to design the look and feel of a website before too much front-end work is done. I was recently looking at a website&#160;that discusses how Microsoft redesigned their front-page and navigation. It&#8217;s a good introduction to the considerations involved in establishing site characteristics. Consistent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2008/03/ui-design01.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dreaded Back Button &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2006/12/backbutton2.html</link>
		<comments>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2006/12/backbutton2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Gravagno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DesignBais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlashCONNECT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2006/12/backbutton2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the &#34;give um an inch&#34; department, it seems people aren&#8217;t happy with eliminating the back button from the browser. Eliminating all of the browser buttons wasn&#8217;t good enough either. No, the very first request was &#34;now can we get rid of the X button in the corner that closes the application? Sigh &#8211; OK, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2006/12/backbutton2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dreaded Back Button</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/general/2006/11/backbutton1.html</link>
		<comments>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/general/2006/11/backbutton1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Gravagno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DesignBais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlashCONNECT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/general/2006/11/backbutton1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once in a while this question comes up about what to do when the user hits the Back button in a browser app. Well, the italian in me says &#34;break their fingers&#34;, but most of my colleagues aren&#8217;t italian, so here&#8217;s a solution for the rest of you. This one is pretty easy. One solution, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/general/2006/11/backbutton1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many licenses do I need?</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2006/05/how-many-licenses-do-i-need.html</link>
		<comments>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2006/05/how-many-licenses-do-i-need.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Gravagno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DesignBais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlashCONNECT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mv.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/general/2006/05/how-many-licenses-do-i-need.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an in-depth explanation of how web clients consume licenses with a back-end MV DBMS. It might be too basic for some people but it should help to bring everyone up to a common level for discussions on this important topic. [Edit July 06, 2006: Because this&#160;article is referred to so often, it has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2006/05/how-many-licenses-do-i-need.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better FlashCONNECT Templates</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2006/02/better-flashconnect-templates.html</link>
		<comments>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2006/02/better-flashconnect-templates.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 04:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Gravagno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FlashCONNECT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2006/02/better-flashconnect-templates.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve done any work with FlashCONNECT templates you know that you need to go through some contortions to get your code to work with them. As designed, you really can&#8217;t just take a raw web page built by your web designer and populate it with data using FC. A long time ago I wrote [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2006/02/better-flashconnect-templates.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Master Pages and w3HtmlInsertSection</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2006/01/master-pages-and-w3htmlinsertsection.html</link>
		<comments>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2006/01/master-pages-and-w3htmlinsertsection.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 03:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Gravagno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlashCONNECT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/rd/2006/01/master-pages-and-w3htmlinsertsection.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever I read about ASP.NET Master Pages I&#8217;m immediately reminded of how they are just like FlashCONNECT w3HtmlInsertSection. See the code for the Template: Multiple Sections demo, then see this for a short intro to master pages: CodeGuru: An In-Depth Coverage of ASP.NET 2.0&#8242;s Master Pages: Part 1 of 3]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/mv/flashconnect/2006/01/master-pages-and-w3htmlinsertsection.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

