Comments on: Why mv.NET? http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/general/2006/06/why-mvnet1.html Welcome to the Nebula Mon, 12 May 2008 00:38:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Tony Gravagno http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/general/2006/06/why-mvnet1.html#comment-42 Tony Gravagno Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:13:44 +0000 http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/general/2006/06/why-mvnet1.html#comment-42 I get lots of inquiries about why mv.NET is better than PDP.NET. Many of these are from sites that (like I did) adopted PDP.NET and then decided they needed something else. In response, I've just drafted a long list of notes comparing the products in business and technical terms. Please let me know if you'd like to discuss these details. I get lots of inquiries about why mv.NET is better than PDP.NET. Many of these are from sites that (like I did) adopted PDP.NET and then decided they needed something else. In response, I’ve just drafted a long list of notes comparing the products in business and technical terms. Please let me know if you’d like to discuss these details.

]]> By: Tony Gravagno http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/general/2006/06/why-mvnet1.html#comment-34 Tony Gravagno Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:42:53 +0000 http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/general/2006/06/why-mvnet1.html#comment-34 <p>As I was providing a link to this article for a new mv.NET prospect it occurred to me that I didn't mention a lot of things I should. In short, one other reason PDP.NET is inadequate is that it still (October 2006) doesn't support the .NET Framework v2.0. Even if they catch up, that's just inexcusable.</p> <p>In fairness I note the world of RedBack has changed drastically. If someone would care to correct my article comments with more recent information I'd really like to have accurate information here. Also, I understand UO.NET does some type of pooling but I have no idea how it works. Please e-mail with info and I'll summarize the info, perhaps in a correction to the article itself. Thanks!</p> As I was providing a link to this article for a new mv.NET prospect it occurred to me that I didn’t mention a lot of things I should. In short, one other reason PDP.NET is inadequate is that it still (October 2006) doesn’t support the .NET Framework v2.0. Even if they catch up, that’s just inexcusable.

In fairness I note the world of RedBack has changed drastically. If someone would care to correct my article comments with more recent information I’d really like to have accurate information here. Also, I understand UO.NET does some type of pooling but I have no idea how it works. Please e-mail with info and I’ll summarize the info, perhaps in a correction to the article itself. Thanks!

]]>