<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking forward to Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2009/04/vista1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2009/04/vista1.html</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Nebula</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Gravagno</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2009/04/vista1.html/comment-page-1#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Gravagno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/tech/2009/04/vista1.html#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Dick-&#160; everyone has a different experience and opinion and I welcome comments from all viewpoints. I just wanted to publish my thoughts in a place that&#039;s easy to find rather than posting the same notes to CDP every month. As I said, I have no beef with WS2008.&#160;SysAdmin types&#160;can handle it. My objection is primarily&#160;with Vista as a workstation platform which is hostile to&#160;consumers and developers who need to support it. Based on the links I&#039;ve provided (and there are many more if required)&#160;and the fact that Microsoft is anxious to replace it with W7, I think I have good grounds to stand on. Best as always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Dick-&nbsp; everyone has a different experience and opinion and I welcome comments from all viewpoints. I just wanted to publish my thoughts in a place that&#8217;s easy to find rather than posting the same notes to CDP every month. As I said, I have no beef with WS2008.&nbsp;SysAdmin types&nbsp;can handle it. My objection is primarily&nbsp;with Vista as a workstation platform which is hostile to&nbsp;consumers and developers who need to support it. Based on the links I&#8217;ve provided (and there are many more if required)&nbsp;and the fact that Microsoft is anxious to replace it with W7, I think I have good grounds to stand on. Best as always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dthiot</title>
		<link>http://nebula-rnd.com/blog/tech/2009/04/vista1.html/comment-page-1#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>dthiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Nebula-RnD.com/blog/tech/2009/04/vista1.html#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Tony,Not to be contrary and I am by no means a Microsoft lover - Linux, Mac or any other platform hater but I have been running Windows Vista 64 for about a year.&#160; The lingering problem that I face at this point in time is a Cisco VPN client which Cisco has chosen not to develop.&#160; I run VMware Workstation constantly and if I need Win XP (only occasionally) I run my old system as a VM.&#160; However, I want to point out that since SP1 Vista has been very stable and plenty fast.&#160; We also run Windows Server 2008 and have done so for more than a year as well.&#160; While you need to learn how to work within the updated security model for either platform, WinSvr 2008 is stable too.You mentioned development platforms.&#160; For some, WinSvr 2008 is a great development platform.&#160; I run WinSvr 2003 as a VM machine on my system with SQL Server 2008, mvBase 2.1, jBASE 4, Universe and QM all installed.&#160; I have both VS 2005 and VS 2008&#160; I also have mv.NET, CodeSmithTools and DotNetNuke running.&#160; It makes for a great dev system!Just my two cents.Dick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,Not to be contrary and I am by no means a Microsoft lover &#8211; Linux, Mac or any other platform hater but I have been running Windows Vista 64 for about a year.&nbsp; The lingering problem that I face at this point in time is a Cisco VPN client which Cisco has chosen not to develop.&nbsp; I run VMware Workstation constantly and if I need Win XP (only occasionally) I run my old system as a VM.&nbsp; However, I want to point out that since SP1 Vista has been very stable and plenty fast.&nbsp; We also run Windows Server 2008 and have done so for more than a year as well.&nbsp; While you need to learn how to work within the updated security model for either platform, WinSvr 2008 is stable too.You mentioned development platforms.&nbsp; For some, WinSvr 2008 is a great development platform.&nbsp; I run WinSvr 2003 as a VM machine on my system with SQL Server 2008, mvBase 2.1, jBASE 4, Universe and QM all installed.&nbsp; I have both VS 2005 and VS 2008&nbsp; I also have mv.NET, CodeSmithTools and DotNetNuke running.&nbsp; It makes for a great dev system!Just my two cents.Dick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

